Evaluating Sources
Health Professions Campus Library
Criteria for evaluating web-based resources
| Accuracy |
Audience |
Author |
Content |
- What is the purpose of the site and why was it produced?
- Is this person qualified to write this site?
- Know the distinction between author (who created the content) and Webmaster (who maintains the site)
|
- Who is the site's audience?
- Are the language and format of the site appropriate to the stated or implied audience?
|
- Who designed/authored the site?
- What can you find out about the credentials or expertise of the designer/author?
- What features of the site convince you that they know what they are talking about?
- What features make you doubt their knowledge or expertise?
- Check the domain of the document. What institution publishes this document?
|
- When was the information on the site last updated?
- Is it accurate?
- Thorough?
- Complete?
- Misleading?
- Is this appropriate?
|
| Coverage |
Currency |
Effectiveness |
Objectivity |
- Is it all images or a balance of text and images?
- Is the information presented cited correctly?
- If page requires special software to view the information, how much are you missing if you don't have the software?
- Is it free, or is there a fee, to obtain the information?
- Is there an option for text only, or frames, or a suggested browser for better viewing?
|
- When was it produced?
- When was it updated?
- Are there any dead links are on the page?
|
- Compared with other similar sites that you have browsed, how effectively does this one convey its content and purpose to its intended audience?
|
- How detailed is the information?
- What opinions (if any) are expressed by the author(s)?
- Determine if page is a mask for advertising; if so, information might be biased
- View any Web page as you would an infommercial on television. Ask yourself why was this written and for whom?
- What goals/objectives does this page meet?
|
| Purpose |
Source |
Other considerations |
|
- What is the purpose of the site?
|
- What kind of site is this (commercial, personal, government, educational, military)?
|
- Aesthetic and affective aspects
- Navigation within a document
- Quality of the links
- Site access and usability
|
|
Kapoun, Jim. "Teaching undergrads WEB evaluation, " C&RL News, July/August, 1998, 522-533.
Criteria for evaluating print resources
| Accuracy |
Audience |
Author |
Content |
- Is this person qualified to write this information?
|
- Who is the target audience of the information?
- Are the language and format of the print resource appropriate to the stated or implied audience?
|
- What can you find out about the credentials or expertise of the author?
- What features convince you that they know what they are talking about?
- What features make you doubt their knowledge or expertise?
- What institution publishes this information?
|
- Is it accurate?
- Thorough?
- Complete?
- Misleading?
- Is this appropriate?
|
| Coverage |
Objectivity |
Purpose |
|
- Is the information presented cited correctly?
|
- What goals/objectives does this information meet?
- How detailed is the information?
- What opinions (if any) are expressed by the author(s)?
- Determine if the information is a mask for advertising; if so, information might be biased
- View any information as you would an infommercial on television.
- Ask yourself why was this written and for whom?
|
- What is the purpose of the information?
|
|