PRISM: Internally Funded Summer Research Grants
Request for Proposals 2013
Disciplines: Anthropology, Biology, Chemistry, Computer Science, Environmental Science, Exercise Science, Mathematics, Physics, Psychology, Social Work, Sociology
Application Deadline. January 21, 2013
Award Notice. February 2013
Spending Window. May 1 – August 31, 2013
Student Stipend. $3,500 for a minimum of 10 full-time weeks of work. Students are responsible for housing and may live on campus for a fee. Faculty members must apply for at least one student and may apply for up to two students. It is likely that funds would be available to fund more than one student for some, but not all, proposals. Proposal ranking would determine which would get a second student.
Faculty Stipend. $3,000 for minimum of 8 full-time weeks of work (students must be able to work safely and independently if the faculty member is absent). Partial summer awards are not allowed. Faculty members who already have summer salary support may apply for student support.
Supplies. Faculty members may request up to $500.
Post-Grant Report. Anyone awarded a grant must submit a post-grant report on its results. Reports are due by Dec. 31, 2013.
End-of-Summer Report: Any student awarded a grant must submit a technical report of their summer research project by Aug. 15, 2013. This report must be written in a style that is consistent with typical submission requirements to a journal in their research area.
Pacific Undergraduate Research Conference. Any student awarded a grant agrees to submit a poster to the Pacific Undergraduate Research Conference, fall 2013. Dissemination of research results at the conference should acknowledge the Pacific Research Institute for Science and Mathematics for funding.
External Dissemination. At a minimum, a national or major regional conference presentation is expected. Peer-reviewed publication is strongly encouraged. Any external dissemination of research results should acknowledge the Pacific Research Institute for Science and Mathematics for funding.
Review Committee. A committee, assembled from the disciplines named above, will review proposals; it will consist of faculty members (and possibly former research students) who have not submitted proposals.
First year of support. Priority will be given to faculty members who do not currently have other sources of substantial support and whose proposals receive the most favorable reviews from the Review Committee.
The Review Committee will use the following evaluative criteria:
A. The research asks interesting questions, is important to the field, and fits into one of the Boyer categories for scholarly and creative contributions (fitting into more than one Boyer category does not increase a proposal’s merit).
B. The research seems likely to succeed and has a high probability of producing results within the available timeframe.
C. The necessary equipment, supplies, and lab/field space are in place.
D. The student experience is likely to be high quality.
E. The proposal is the continuation of a successful project or has a high likelihood of continuing beyond the summer.
F. The project shows promise for peer-reviewed publication.
Second year of support. In order to receive a second year of funding, the faculty member’s proposal must pass the same evaluative criteria outlined for the first year of funding and must include an updated timeline showing progress toward the submission of project results to a national or major regional conference or to a peer-reviewed journal. This progress will be taken into consideration in recommending further funding.
Third year of support. In order to receive a third year of funding, the faculty member’s proposal must pass the same evaluative criteria outlined for the first year of funding and must be made concurrently with or after the submission of project results to a national or major regional conference or to a peer-reviewed journal. The faculty member must also show progress toward obtaining outside funding. This progress will be taken into consideration in recommending further funding.
UPCOMING CHANGES: Beginning in 2014 anyone seeking funding beyond the first year of support will be required to submit an external grant proposal (since the time of their last PRISM award) or be in the process of submitting an external grant proposal. If a proposal has been submitted, a copy of the proposal must be included with the PRISM proposal. If a proposal is in the process of being submitted, a draft of the proposal, details of the external program, and a planned submission date must be included with the PRISM proposal. In addition to the external proposal, the faculty member’s PRISM proposal must pass the same evaluative criteria outlined for the first year of funding and must show progress toward peer-reviewed publication. Finally, in order to receive additional years of PRISM support, principal investigators are expected to contribute to developing the campus research community (for example, a PI might organize undergraduate research seminars during the academic year or community building events during the summer).
When submitting a research article, you will be asked for the following items separately:
a. Name of Principal Investigator (required)
b. Name of co-Principal Investigator (optional)
c. Date (required)
d. Information about any required review board approvals for project (required)
If this proposal requires approval from any of the above mentioned committees, a copy of the approval letter from the committee(s) must be submitted to the Dean’s office before any funds awarded through this grant program will be released.
e. Sources of PRISM funding in last 5 years (required)
f. Years of prior PRISM support (required for sources stated in g)
g. External grant proposals submitted in last 5 years (required)
Indicate agency, amount, dates of submission/award and whether it is related to this proposal.
h. Peer-reviewed publications in last 5 years (required)
List all peer-reviewed publications that have been published, accepted, or are in preparation. Provide complete citation and title, and use asterisks to indicate undergraduate co-authors.
i. Conference presentations in last 5 years (required)
List all conference presentations that have been given or are in preparation. Provide complete citation and title, and use asterisks to indicate undergraduate co-authors.
j. Undergraduates mentored in last 5 years (required)
Give names of all students who worked on research with you and the dates that the work took place. Use asterisks to indicate which students worked on projects related to this proposal.
k. CVs of PI and co-PI (if necessary) in pdf format (required)
l. Proposal in pdf format (required, style guide below)
m. Copy of external proposal/draft proposal (required for additional years of PRISM support)
In order to receive an additional year of PRISM funding, an external proposal must have been submitted (since the time of the last PRISM award) or be in the process of being submitted. If a proposal has been submitted, a copy of the proposal must be included with the PRISM proposal. If a proposal is in the process of being submitted, a draft of the proposal, details of the external program, and a planned submission date must be included with the PRISM proposal.
Proposal Style Guide
The proposal body (sections I-IX below) should be not exceed 3 pages in length and should have the following format:
I. Title of project:
II. Boyer category
Brief description of how this work fits into one of the Boyer categories for scholarly and creative contributions (discovery of knowledge, integration of knowledge, application of knowledge, transformation of knowledge through teaching).
Provide a general context for the project. Does the project continue from previous work?
IV. Experimental Plan
Describe the research in enough detail so that readers will understand the protocols. Explain the roles of the student and the faculty member.
V. Significance of Project
Describe the importance of the project to the field. Will it continue beyond the summer? What are the prospects for outside funding in the future?
VI. Expected Outcomes
Describe the likely places the results of this work will be externally disseminated (national and/or major regional conferences, peer-reviewed journals, etc.). What is the likely timeline for the work to be disseminated?
A. Faculty Stipend ($3,000)
B. Student Stipend ($3,500 per student researcher for 10 weeks of work)
C. Equipment and supplies (max. $500) - provide justification
D. Total budget (sum of A, B, and C above)
VIII. Address the following questions:
1. Where will the research be carried out? What facilities are needed, and are they available?
2. What equipment and supplies are needed (beyond those in C above), and are they available?
3. Is the research contingent on raising any other funds or on finding any other resources? If so, what are those?
4. What other funding, if any, will you have between now and September 2012?
IX. Community Contributions
Provide details about your contributions to the development of the campus research community as described in the Funding Criteria section of the RFP.
Provide a list of references related to this project.
Click here to begin submission.