School of Learning and Teaching Continuous Improvement Plan
It is important to us that we have a reliable sense of how effective our graduates are as teachers as well as how satisfied employers and our graduates are with our teacher preparation programs. In order for us to have a comprehensive understanding of effectiveness and satisfaction, we have designed a quality assurance system that surveys employers and our graduates, analyzes statewide student assessment data, and documents our graduates teaching in the field.
Continuous Improvement Instruments
The Employer/Completer Survey - The Employer/Completer survey asks our graduates how well they believe our program prepared them for their first year of teaching. The survey also asks superintendents and principals of schools that employ our graduates about their observations of our graduates' performance. The survey's objective is to help the School of Learning and Teaching determine how the program is effective at developing the essential knowledge and skills that teachers need to be successful. It also identifies areas where we can improve. The Employer/Completer survey is distributed annually.
The Employer/Completer survey asks superintendents and principals to rate our graduates using the inTASC standards as the measure for teacher effectiveness. Superintendents and principals rate our graduates in four main categories of preparation: learner and learning, content knowledge, professional responsibility, and instructional practice. Graduates are asked to rate their preparation on a 1 to 4 Likert scale with 1 meaning “Very Dissatisfied” and 4 meaning “Very Satisfied.”
P12 Student Performance on Statewide Achievement Tests - Beginning in 18-19, the Oregon Department of Education will be providing all teacher preparation programs with 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade achievement test data, disaggregated by teacher preparation program. This will enable us to track our our graduates for three years and provide one lens into how our program has contributed to their success in the classroom.
Case studies on Pacific University Teacher Effectiveness - In an effort to triangulate data from several sources, Pacific University is designing case studies to test the effectiveness of our graduates in their classrooms. Pacific intends to study p12 effectiveness in an Action Research paradigm by using a stratified random sample (program, level, content area) of our 1st, 2nd, and 3rd year graduates to provide another lens onto how our program contributes to their success in the classroom. Our plan is to begin collecting this data in 18-19.
Continuous Improvement Instrument Results
Our teacher preparation program’s impact on P-12 Student Learning
- Data in development: Expected 20-21
Indicators of Teacher Effectiveness
- P-12 student performance on statewide achievement tests: expected 20-21
- Case studies on Pacific University Teacher Effectiveness: expected 20-21
- 18-19 Teacher Effectiveness Survey Summary
- 17-18 Teacher Effectiveness Survey Summary
- 16-17 Employer/Completer survey summary
Employer Satisfaction with Pacific University Graduates
Results of the Employer/Completer survey for Pacific graduates who were hired between 2013-2016 indicate that superintendents and principals were pleased with our preparation. 100% of the administrators checked “yes” to “Would you hire or recommend hiring this teacher” and 100% of administrators who completed the survey checked that they were “very satisfied” with the overall performance of the teacher.
- 18-19 Employer satisfaction survey summary
- 17-18 Employer satisfaction survey summary
- 16-17 Employer satisfaction survey summary
Graduate Satisfaction with their Pacific University Program
- 18-19 Alumni satisfaction survey summary
- 17-18 Alumni satisfaction survey summary
- 16-17 Alumni satisfaction survey summary
Program Completion Data
- Pacific University graduation rates by program
- 18-19 Teacher graduate employment rates:
- 17-18 Teacher graduate employment rates:
CAEP EPP Annual Report - Academic Year 2015-2016
Each year Education Preparation Providers are required to submit annual reports to the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) that gather common data for eight annual measures. These measures demonstrate impact around student learning and teacher effectiveness. These data are useful to multiple audiences. They inform CAEP about the degree to which providers continue to meet CAEP Standards between accreditation visits. The data also provide important information for the benefit of consumers. Providers can use the data in their self-studies to analyze trends and demonstrate their use in their continuous improvement efforts.
The 2017 EPP Annual Report for the 2015-16 Academic Year is available by clicking here.